A New Kind of March Madness
Source: The Hill
A new kind of March Madness
- 03/16/10 12:56 PM ET
This
March, millions of young people are rallying nationwide in energetic
crowds, chanting, singing and holding up signs, funneling their
idealistic passion into a single cause of great importance to college
students. Sounds like the annual uproar surrounding NCAA basketball,
right? Well, this is a different kind of March Madness.
Throughout
the first week of March, college students organized over 120 actions in
over thirty states to rally against the historic divestment from higher
education. There was a laundry list of grievances to protest. The
Pell grant, once the cornerstone of student aid, has plummeted from
covering seventy-two percent of the cost of college to just thirty-two,
tuition increases have skyrocketed into the double-digits as states
balance their budgets by slashing higher education funding, two-thirds
of students are taking out mortgage-sized loans to pay for college,
sending the average borrower nearly twenty-five thousand dollars in
debt at graduation, and, as with the rest of America, students continue
to struggle in one of the worst job markets on record. So students
spoke up and displayed a new kind of March Madness through massive
1960-style rallies, demonstrations, and marches.
These actions
go far beyond exorcising the frustration felt by the nation’s
debt-ridden students. On March 20-23rd, over five hundred students are
taking this vigor and enthusiasm to Capitol Hill to urge their Senators
to pass a student aid reform proposal that has recently been included
in the budget reconciliation bill. The proposal, which mirrors the
Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, encompasses President
Obama’s plan to reform the student lending industry by eliminating the
Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), which allows the
government to heavily subsidize private lenders to originate and
service federal student loans. Ending this program would save tens of
billions of dollars that would go directly to students, through the
aptly named Direct Loan Program, via increases to the Pell grant,
low-interest rate Perkins Loans, access and completion programs, and
investments in Minority-Serving Institutions. Because all of these
investments are paid for by funds that would have gone towards bank
subsidies, the legislation doesn’t cost the taxpayers a dime.
Students
overwhelmingly support the proposal. During the 2009 National Student
Congress, student aid reform was unanimously passed as a top
legislative priority for the United States Student Association, which
represents over 4.5 million college students. Hundreds of student
governments have subsequently adopted resolutions supporting the
Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, and hundreds of thousands of
students have contributed to a national “wall of student debt” with
paper “bricks” exhibiting their personal and financial struggles to pay
for college. More recently, in the past few days since Senator Tom
Harkin and Congressman George Miller announced that student aid reform
would be included in budget reconciliation, college students sent over
two thousand letters to Congress expressing support for this action.
Despite being swamped with debt, class loads, and an increasingly dire
job prospects, on top of being the second most uninsured demographic
for healthcare, college students have mobilized a coast-to-coast
grassroots campaign to pass student aid reform. National in breadth
and substantive in depth, the campaign is moving from street protests
to the Halls of Congress.
As with most underdogs, there is a
Goliath to the students’ David. The nation’s top private lenders are
waging their own political campaign to stop student aid reform.
Lenders’ Political Action Committees (PACs), high-priced lobbyists, and
million dollar warchests are mounting a formidable opposition to
students and their prized legislation. In 2009, lenders spent about
four million dollars on lobbying; that’s the equivalent of twenty-five
thousand dollars for every day Congress was in session last year. PACs
for lenders made over two million dollars in political contributions,
with Sallie Mae’s PAC leading the pack with 194,000 dollars in
donations. So while students invest what little time and resources
they have in passing real reform, big banks are pouring millions of
dollars into obstructionist lobbying tactics aimed at maintaining a
status quo that perpetuates a lending system that has led to the
greatest amount of student debt in history. These tactics may have
swayed legislators from states with big lending influences, but
students have not been fooled. And while students may not have the
kind of money that lenders so freely spend on lobbying, young people
have power in numbers and passion and will bring both to Capitol Hill
this weekend to fight for loan reform.
Against overwhelming
odds, America’s youth has always fought the institutionalized,
business-as-usual policies that garner profits over the advancement of
socioeconomic justice. Like their Great Society predecessors, today’s
college student activists are our nation’s conscious. And as March
maddens, the fight for student aid reform is moving from local protests
to the Nation’s Capitol. Bring on the madness.
Gregory Cendana is President of the United States Student Association.
Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/87069-a-new-kind-of-march-madness
